Beitrag 25 von 35 Beiträgen. |
Seite erstellt am 25.4.24 um 17:51 Uhr |
Verfasser: shana Datum: Freitag, den 21. Mai 2010, um 10:45 Uhr Betrifft: Allgemein üblich? Hallo!?!
> diese Maschinen sind allgemein üblich wo viel unterschrieben werden muss, eben von Glückwunschkarten aus dem Bundeskanzleramt bis Beileidsbriefen aus dem US-Verteidigungsbriefen und eben auch Missionsberufungen.
Hier ging es ja nicht um den Unterschriften-Automaten an sich, sondern um den Betrug gegenüber dem Kirchenvolk. Aber in gewisser Weise hast Du natürlich auch recht. Letzteres (die Verarschung der Gläubigen) ist ja durchaus allgemein üblich.
Hier nochmal ein paar Auszüge aus dem oben erwähnten thread zur Verdeutlichung.
> "President Benson did not even personally sign the documents that surrendered his legal control of the corporation. According to the Tribune, a signature machine was used to place Bensons name on the document. This procedure was described as legal but, certainly out of the norm, by Fran Fish, notary public administrator for Utahs Department of Commerce (ibid.)
> "By May 1989 the counselors [Hinckley and Monson] felt it necessary to execute legal documents giving them Ezra Taft Bensons power of attorney [which] shall not be affected by his disability or incompetence. However, Benson was already affected by that disability. Despite a notarized statement by the First Presidencys secretary, President Benson did not sign those documents himself. A signature machine produced Bensons identical signature on these legal documents.
> "In July 1993 the First Presidency spokesman claimed that the typical faithful Mormon already knew that Ezra Taft Bensons mental condition prevented the church president from participating in decision-making. [Note: The spokesmans claim is not true. LDS church spokesman at the time, Don Lefevre, had issued a public statement asserting that no major Church decisions were made without ETBs personal involvement in the decision-making process. When I personally confronted LeFevre outside his offices in the then-Hotel Utah and told him that my grandfather was too physically and mentally incapacitated to participate in meaningful decision making, LeFevre replied that his public statements had been approved by his "superiors." When I replied that simply because his superiors had signed off on his statements didnt make them true, LeFevre paused and said, "This is a difficult job"].
Und hier das ganze nochmal im Zusammenhang nachzulesen: